So What Club
Start free

Cut cost

Asset-light shift

Franchising, management contracts, sale and leaseback

Examples checked

In one minute

Selling or not buying the heavy assets, and earning fees for running or branding them instead.

The big idea: Letting others own the buildings, fleets or pipelines frees capital and raises the return on what remains. Profit usually falls, so the move pays only if the cash released earns more elsewhere than the assets did, and the fees or lease terms do not lock in a bad deal.

Works when
When the assets earn a low return, investors will pay a good price for them, and the brand or system is what customers really pay for.
Fails when
When rent or lease payments rise faster than the business, or the company loses control of the quality customers see.
Check this number first
Return on the assets today. Profit they earn divided by what they would sell for.
In the worked example
Change in yearly profit: minus USD 21 (USD millions a year). See it add up

What it is

An asset-heavy company owns what it runs: hotels, restaurants, aircraft, pipelines. An asset-light company earns fees for its brand or for running assets others own. The main routes are franchising, management contracts (running a hotel for its owner for a fee) and sale and leaseback (selling an asset and renting it back).

  • Franchising. Local owners pay fees and royalties to use your brand and system.
  • Management contracts. You run assets owned by others, for a fee often tied to revenue and profit.
  • Sale and leaseback. Sell an asset to an investor and rent it back, so you keep using it but no longer own it.

Why companies do it

The economic logic, most important first. A move usually rests on one or two of these.

  • Capital efficiency. Fee businesses need little capital, so the return on capital is high and growth needs less money.
  • Risk. Owners carry more of the property and demand risk.
  • Growth. The brand can grow as fast as owners and franchisees can be found, not as fast as the company can fund buildings.

When it creates value, and when it destroys it

Creates value when

  • The assets earn less than the cost of capital, and buyers will pay a full price for them.
  • The brand and system are what customers pay for, and they can be policed in assets you do not own.
  • The released cash pays down debt or funds investments that earn more.

Destroys value when

  • Lease payments rise each year faster than the business, and squeeze profit in a downturn.
  • Franchisees or owners cut corners and the brand suffers.
  • The cash raised is spent on something that earns less than the assets did.

The numbers to check

Ask for these, in this order, before you recommend the move.

  1. Return on the assets today. Profit they earn divided by what they would sell for.
  2. Fees kept after the sale. Management fees, franchise royalties.
  3. Lease or rent cost after a sale and leaseback, and how it rises. Fixed payments raise risk.
  4. What the cash will earn. The move pays only if the money earns more than the assets did.

Worked example (illustrative)

Rounded numbers for a made-up business, shaped like real ones. Positive lines add to profit; negative lines are costs.

A hotel group owns hotels worth USD 1,800 million that earn USD 120 million a year after upkeep. It can sell them for that value, use USD 1,200 million to repay debt at 6 percent interest, and keep running the hotels for a fee of 3 percent of USD 500 million revenue plus 8 percent of USD 150 million hotel profit.

Worked example for Asset-light shift: franchising, management contracts, sale and leaseback, in USD millions a year. Illustrative figures.
LineUSD millions a year
Hotel profit after upkeep, no longer earnedminus USD 120
Fees: 3 percent of USD 500 million plus 8 percent of USD 150 millionUSD 27
Interest saved: USD 1,200 million of debt repaid x 6 percentUSD 72
Change in yearly profitminus USD 21

Check: the lines above add up to the total.

The numbers that decide it

Return the hotels earned on their value: 120 / 1,800
6.7 percent
Cash left after repaying debt: 1,800 minus 1,200
USD 600

So what: Profit falls by USD 21 million a year, but USD 600 million of cash is left and the fee business needs almost no capital. The hotels earned only 6.7 percent on their value, so if the USD 600 million earns more than about 3.5 percent (21 divided by 600), the owners are better off.

Real examples

Companies that made this move, by region, with what happened and a source checked on the date shown.

How to recommend it in a case

Answer first, then the reasons with numbers, then the risk and the next step. Three sentences, said out loud.

I recommend selling the hotels and keeping management contracts, because the hotels earn only 6.7 percent on USD 1,800 million, and the sale frees USD 600 million after repaying debt.

Profit falls by about USD 21 million a year, so the move pays if the cash earns more than about 3.5 percent, and our fee business grows without new capital.

The risk is losing control of quality in hotels we do not own; next I would set brand standards and performance terms in the contracts, and decide how to use the USD 600 million.

The numbers to quote: Return on the assets today; Fees kept; Cash released; Hurdle rate for the cash.

The figures in the answer come from the illustrative worked example above. In a case, use the client's own numbers.

Classic interview traps

  • Looking only at the fall in profit. The point is the capital released and the return on it.
  • Treating a sale and leaseback as free money. Rent is a fixed cost and often rises every year.
  • Forgetting control: say how you will keep quality in assets you no longer own.

Where it is common

Sources

Practise it