Premiumisation and trading down
Examples checked
In one minute
Shifting sales toward dearer, higher margin products, or offering cheaper ones when customers trade down.
The big idea: Selling a better mix can lift profit without selling more units, because premium products usually keep more per unit. But premium brands cost money to build, and when budgets tighten customers trade down, so a company needs a plan for both.
- Works when
- When customers will pay more for a real difference, and the premium line earns enough per unit to repay its marketing.
- Fails when
- When the premium is only a label, marketing eats the gain, or a downturn sends customers to cheaper brands and own labels.
- Check this number first
- Profit per unit by tier. Shows how much a better mix is worth.
- In the worked example
- Profit after the shift: EUR 68 (EUR millions a year, after the shift). See it add up
What it is
Premiumisation means selling more of the dearer versions in a category: premium spirits, larger cars, better phones. Trading down is the opposite customer behaviour: switching to cheaper brands, smaller packs or discount stores. Mix is the share of sales from each price tier, and a change in mix changes profit even when volume does not move.
- Premium line. Add a dearer version or brand above the current range.
- Mix management. Push marketing and shelf space toward higher margin products.
- Fighting brand or value line. A cheaper line to keep customers who trade down, without cutting the main brand's price.
Why companies do it
The economic logic, most important first. A move usually rests on one or two of these.
- Margin capture. Premium products usually earn a higher profit per unit, so a better mix lifts profit on the same volume.
- Pricing power. Strong brands can raise prices with less loss of volume.
- Growth. In mature markets, volume barely grows, so mix becomes the main lever.
When it creates value, and when it destroys it
Creates value when
- Customers see a real difference: quality, design, status, experience.
- The premium profit per unit covers the extra marketing and product cost.
- The company also has a value offer, so customers who trade down stay with it.
Destroys value when
- A downturn pushes customers to cheaper options and the company has nothing to offer them.
- The premium is only a label, and customers see through it.
- Marketing to build the premium brand costs more than the extra margin.
The numbers to check
Ask for these, in this order, before you recommend the move.
- Profit per unit by tier. Shows how much a better mix is worth.
- Mix: share of volume in each tier, and its trend. Is the market moving up or down?
- Marketing cost of the premium line. Building a premium brand is not free.
- Share lost to own labels and discounters. The signal that customers are trading down.
Worked example (illustrative)
Rounded numbers for a made-up business, shaped like real ones. Positive lines add to profit; negative lines are costs.
A brewer sells 10 million cases a year. A standard case earns EUR 6 of profit and a premium case EUR 12. It plans to lift premium from 10 to 30 percent of volume, spending EUR 10 million a year more on marketing.
| Line | EUR millions a year, after the shift |
|---|---|
| Standard cases: 7 million x EUR 6 | EUR 42 |
| Premium cases: 3 million x EUR 12 | EUR 36 |
| Extra marketing for the premium brand | minus EUR 10 |
| Profit after the shift | EUR 68 |
Check: the lines above add up to the total.
The numbers that decide it
- Profit before: 9 million x EUR 6 plus 1 million x EUR 12
- EUR 66
- Gain from the shift
- EUR 2
- Gain before the extra marketing
- EUR 12
So what: The better mix adds EUR 12 million of profit, but EUR 10 million of marketing eats most of it, leaving EUR 2 million. Premiumisation pays when the brand eventually needs less support per case, or the premium price can rise. Check the marketing, not only the margin.
Real examples
Companies that made this move, by region, with what happened and a source checked on the date shown.
Diageo
EuropeMixedThe spirits group pushed its premium brands: premium-plus brands reached 63 percent of reported net sales in fiscal 2023, up 7 points from fiscal 2019. By fiscal 2025, with shoppers under pressure, organic net sales grew only 1.7 percent and organic operating profit fell 0.7 percent.
The lesson: Premiumisation lifted margins in good years but left the group exposed when drinkers traded down.
Source 1: Diageo, preliminary results for the year to 30 June 2023 (regulatory announcement), 1 August 2023 (opens in a new tab), checked .
Hindustan Unilever
IndiaToo early to tellHUL says its premium segments keep growing ahead of mass products, and it agreed to buy 90.5 percent of the premium beauty brand Minimalist at an enterprise value of Rs 2,955 crore before new money.
The lesson: Buying a premium brand is a fast way to shift the mix, if the buyer does not dilute what made it premium.
Source 2: Hindustan Unilever, third quarter 2024-25 earnings call transcript (BSE filing), January 2025 (opens in a new tab), checked .
Indian car market (SUVs)
IndiaCreated valueIndian car buyers moved up to SUVs: utility vehicles were 65 percent of passenger vehicle sales in 2024-25, up from about 60 percent the year before, in a record year of 4.3 million passenger vehicles.
The lesson: Makers strong in larger, dearer vehicles gained; small car makers had to follow the mix or lose share.
Source 3: Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), Auto Industry Sales Performance of March 2025, 15 April 2025 (opens in a new tab), checked .
Aldi and Lidl (United Kingdom)
EuropeCreated valueTrading down: in the 12 weeks to 7 September 2025 Lidl's sales rose 11.0 percent, lifting its share of the British grocery market to 8.2 percent, and Aldi held 10.7 percent.
The lesson: When budgets tighten, discounters win; mainstream grocers answer with their own value and premium own labels.
Source 4: Kantar Worldpanel, "Consumers seek value as Britain heads back to school", 14 October 2025 (opens in a new tab), checked .
McDonald's
United StatesMixedAnswering trading down: comparable sales fell 0.7 percent in the US in the second quarter of 2024 as fewer guests came. After a push on value meals, US comparable sales were up 0.3 percent in the third quarter.
The lesson: A value offer can win back price-sensitive customers, but it lifts traffic more than profit per order.
Source 5: McDonald's, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2024 (US SEC) (opens in a new tab), checked .
How to recommend it in a case
Answer first, then the reasons with numbers, then the risk and the next step. Three sentences, said out loud.
I recommend the premium push only with a cheaper marketing plan, because as planned it lifts profit by just EUR 2 million a year.
Moving premium from 10 to 30 percent of volume adds EUR 12 million of margin, since a premium case earns EUR 12 against EUR 6, but the EUR 10 million of marketing takes most of it.
The other risk is a downturn sending drinkers to cheaper beers; next I would test whether the premium price can rise and keep a value line for those who trade down.
The numbers to quote: Profit per unit by tier; Mix shift; Extra marketing cost; Net profit change.
The figures in the answer come from the illustrative worked example above. In a case, use the client's own numbers.
Classic interview traps
- Counting the margin gain and forgetting the marketing to build the premium brand.
- Assuming customers will keep paying more in a downturn.
- Ignoring cannibalisation: some premium sales come from your own standard customers.
Where it is common
Industries
- Consumer goods (FMCG)
- Luxury and fashion
- Restaurants and food service
- Automotive and electric vehicles
- Retail
- Hotels and travel
- Agriculture and food
Business model patterns it relates to
Sources
Every source was opened and the example confirmed on the date shown. Worked examples are illustrative and use no company's figures.
- 1.Diageo, preliminary results for the year to 30 June 2023 (regulatory announcement), 1 August 2023 (opens in a new tab)Checked
- 2.Hindustan Unilever, third quarter 2024-25 earnings call transcript (BSE filing), January 2025 (opens in a new tab)Checked
- 3.Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), Auto Industry Sales Performance of March 2025, 15 April 2025 (opens in a new tab)Checked
- 4.Kantar Worldpanel, "Consumers seek value as Britain heads back to school", 14 October 2025 (opens in a new tab)Checked
- 5.McDonald's, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2024 (US SEC) (opens in a new tab)Checked
Practise it
Where this move comes up in cases
Related moves
- Pricing movesChanging what you charge, how often, and on what basis.
- Bundling and unbundlingSelling products together for one price, or splitting one price into separate charges.
- Channel shift and going direct to consumerSelling straight to customers (online or in your own stores) instead of through retailers.