Real growth, people and income
How to strip inflation out of a growth number, and how age structure, cities, average and median income, and inequality decide who can buy what.
Firm processes and online tests change from year to year and differ by office. Use this to prepare, and confirm the exact current steps on the firm's own careers page.
Key takeaways
- A number that grew may not have grown. First strip out price rises, which gives real growth.
- Common mistakes: Calling nominal growth "growth" in a high-inflation country.
- A nominal figure is measured in the money of the day.
Key idea
A number that grew may not have grown. First strip out price rises, which gives real growth. Then ask how many people can buy, how old they are, where they live and what they can spend.
Real versus nominal
A nominal figure is measured in the money of the day. A real figure removes the effect of price changes, so it shows how much more (or less) was actually sold or produced. If a shop sells the same 100 loaves this year as last year, but bread costs 10 percent more, its nominal sales are up 10 percent and its real sales are flat. The exact formula is: real growth = (1 + nominal growth) / (1 + inflation), minus 1. When both numbers are small, nominal growth minus inflation is a good shortcut. When inflation is high, use the exact formula, because the shortcut goes wrong.
Worked case
Did sales really grow? A retailer in Argentina
The prompt
A fictional clothing retailer in Argentina reports that its peso sales rose 30 percent in 2025 and asks whether that was a good year. The IMF puts Argentina's average consumer price inflation for 2025 at 41.9 percent. Was it a good year in real terms?
The structure
- Real growth = (1 + nominal growth) / (1 + inflation) minus 1
- Nominal growth: 30 percent (the client's number)
- Inflation: 41.9 percent (IMF, 2025 average)
- Key: Real growth, exact formula
- Compare with the shortcut, and with the market
Working it through
1. Real growth, exact formula
1.30 divided by 1.419, minus 1.
Real sales growth (percent):(1.3 ÷ 1.419 - 1) × 100 = -8.392. The shortcut
Nominal growth minus inflation. With inflation this high it overstates the fall.
Shortcut estimate (percent):30 - 41.9 = -11.9
The recommendation
No. Sales rose 30 percent in pesos, but prices rose about 41.9 percent on average, so in real terms the retailer sold about 8.4 percent less than a year earlier. It lost ground. The next step is to compare it with the market: if clothing volumes across Argentina fell more, it may still have gained share. With inflation this high, always use the exact formula; the shortcut says minus 11.9 percent, which is more than 3 points off.
Risks: The IMF figure is an average for all consumer prices; clothing prices may have risen faster or slower than the average.; The 30 percent is fictional; a real case would give the client's own number..
A company's sales grow 12 percent in a year when inflation is 5 percent. What is its real growth, in percent, using the exact formula?
The same logic applies to whole economies. The IMF reports real GDP growth (volumes) and GDP in US dollars (values), and the two can tell very different stories. India's real growth for fiscal year 2025 to 2026 was 7.6 percent in the IMF's April 2026 database (7.7 percent in its July update), yet its GDP measured in US dollars grew only about 4.1 percent, from USD 3,761 billion to USD 3,916 billion, because prices and the rupee's exchange rate also moved. For a company planning in dollars, both numbers matter: real growth tells you about demand, the dollar figure tells you what that demand is worth to you.
The IMF puts India's GDP at USD 3,760.8 billion for 2024 and USD 3,916.3 billion for 2025 (fiscal years). By what percent did GDP grow in US dollars?
People: the demand behind every market
Four questions about people decide most consumer markets. How many are there? How old are they? Where do they live (cities or the countryside)? What can they spend, and how evenly is income spread? The table compares ten economies on age and cities, using World Bank figures for 2025.
| Economy | Urban population (percent) | Aged 0 to 14 (percent) | Aged 65 and over (percent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 63.8 | 40.5 | 3.1 |
| India | 35.7 | 24.2 | 7.4 |
| Indonesia | 59.4 | 24.2 | 7.5 |
| Saudi Arabia | 84.6 | 23.6 | 3.1 |
| Brazil | 88.2 | 19.4 | 11.5 |
| United States | 80.2 | 17.1 | 18.4 |
| China | 66.3 | 15.4 | 14.9 |
| United Arab Emirates | 86 | 16 | 1.8 |
| Germany | 82.1 | 13.9 | 23.7 |
| Japan | 92.3 | 11.2 | 30 |
Source: World Bank World Development Indicators, 2025 values, checked 2026-10-01. Countries define "urban" differently.
So-what
Nigeria is a young market, with about 4 in 10 people under 15; Japan and Germany are old ones, with about a quarter or more aged 65 and over. India is still mostly rural.
Age shapes what people buy. In Nigeria about 40.5 percent of people are under 15, so school supplies and baby products are big markets today, and first jobs and first homes will be tomorrow. In Japan 30 percent are 65 or older, so healthcare, care services and products for older people grow while the workforce shrinks. Births tell you what comes next: in 2024 the World Bank recorded 4.38 births per woman in Nigeria, 1.96 in India, 1.15 in Japan and 1.01 in China. A rate of about 2.1 keeps a population stable over time without migration; well below that, the population eventually shrinks. China's population fell by 3.39 million in 2025, to 1,404.89 million, according to its statistics office.
The IMF puts Nigeria's population at 237.6 million in 2025, and the World Bank says 40.5 percent of Nigerians are aged 0 to 14. Roughly how many children under 15 is that, in millions? (The two sources count population slightly differently, so treat the answer as an estimate.)
Cities matter because city dwellers buy differently: more packaged food, more modern shops and online orders, more services. India was 35.7 percent urban in 2025 by the World Bank's measure, so most of its people still live in villages and small towns, which shapes how goods reach them. Be careful with definitions: the World Bank puts China at 66.3 percent urban, while China's own statistics office reports 67.89 percent of permanent residents living in urban areas at the end of 2025. Use one source for a comparison and say which.
Income: average, median and spread
GDP per person is a quick measure of how rich a country is, but it is not what a household takes home. For spending power, look for household income or spending surveys from the national statistics office. Two more ideas help. The average (mean) income is pulled up by a few very rich households; the median is the income of the household in the middle, so it describes a typical household better. In China in 2025, disposable income per person (income after tax and transfers) averaged 43,377 yuan, but the median was 36,231 yuan. Urban residents averaged 56,502 yuan against 24,456 yuan for rural residents, more than twice as much. In the United States, the Census Bureau put median household income at USD 87,460 for 2025.
In China in 2025, the median disposable income per person was 36,231 yuan and the average was 43,377 yuan. What percent of the average is the median?
Spread is measured by the Gini index, from 0 (everyone has the same income) to 100 (one person has everything). In the World Bank's latest data it is 54.1 for South Africa (2022), 50.3 for Brazil (2024), 41.8 for the United States (2024) and 33.7 for Germany (2022). In a very unequal market there may be a sizeable group of rich buyers for premium goods next to a mass market that needs very low prices, and little in between. Some countries, India among them, measure the spread of spending rather than income, which gives lower numbers (India's latest is 25.5, for 2022), so only compare like with like. "Middle class" has no single official definition: if a case needs its size, define an income band in the local currency and take the share of households inside it from the national household survey.
Calling nominal growth "growth" in a high-inflation country. Using the average income to price a mass-market product. Comparing dollar GDP per person across countries as if a dollar bought the same everywhere: in lower-cost countries it buys more, which is what purchasing power parity (PPP) figures correct for. Mixing population figures from different sources and years in one calculation without saying so.
Sales rose 8 percent while inflation was 8 percent. What happened in real terms?
Why is the median income often more useful than the average for pricing a mass-market product?
Sources for this lesson (13)
- Recognized public explanations of case-interview concepts and terms
- IMF World Economic Outlook database, April 2026: inflation, average consumer prices, annual percent change (IMF DataMapper, indicator PCPIPCH)
- IMF World Economic Outlook database, April 2026: GDP at current prices, USD billions (IMF DataMapper, indicator NGDPD)
- IMF World Economic Outlook database, April 2026: real GDP growth, annual percent change (IMF DataMapper, indicator NGDP_RPCH)
- IMF, World Economic Outlook Update, July 2026: "Global Economy in Crosscurrents of War and Technology" (Table 1 and text)
- IMF World Economic Outlook database, April 2026: population, millions (IMF DataMapper, indicator LP)
- World Bank, World Development Indicators: urban population, percent of total (2025 values)
- World Bank, World Development Indicators: population aged 0 to 14, percent of total (2025 values)
- World Bank, World Development Indicators: population aged 65 and above, percent of total (2025 values)
- World Bank, World Development Indicators: fertility rate, births per woman (2024 values)
- World Bank, World Development Indicators: Gini index (latest survey year by country)
- National Bureau of Statistics of China, Statistical Communiqué on the 2025 National Economic and Social Development, 28 February 2026
- US Census Bureau, "Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2025", September 2026
My notes on this lesson
0 of 5,000 characters. Saves automatically.
Try the 6 remaining checks and drills above to complete this lesson (0 of 6 done).
Spotted something wrong or out of date? Report a mistake. We check every report and correct the page.