An appliance maker in Ohio: more inspectors, or fewer defects?
New to this industry?Start with its one-minute summary: Retail
| Kind of cost | What it is here | Cost a year |
|---|---|---|
| Prevention | Nothing spent today | 0 |
| Appraisal | 6 inspectors | 300 |
| Internal failure | 6,000 units reworked at USD 30 | 180 |
| External failure | 2,000 units at USD 250 | 500 |
| Total cost of quality | 980 |
The prompt
A maker of kitchen appliances in Ohio, United States, builds 200,000 units a year. 4 percent are defective. Its 6 inspectors (USD 50,000 a year each) catch 75 percent of defects, which cost USD 30 each to rework. The rest reach customers and cost USD 250 each in warranty repairs, shipping and replacements. The cost breakdown is in the table with this case. Option A: hire 3 more inspectors to catch 90 percent. Option B: spend USD 400,000 once on better moulds and fixtures that cannot be assembled wrongly, plus USD 100,000 a year on training, which cuts defects to 1 percent. Which is better? (Fictional company, illustrative figures.)
Practice with a partner
1. Send the interviewer link to a friend. They read the case aloud and hold the answers.
2. You open the candidate view: you see only the prompt, a timer and a notes box.
3. Speak the case out loud. Your partner shares data when you ask, then scores you with the rubric.
Interviewer view
For the person running the case
Candidate view
For the person answering the case
Clarifying questions, with the interviewer's answers
The exhibit
| Kind of cost | What it is here | Cost a year |
|---|---|---|
| Prevention | Nothing spent today | 0 |
| Appraisal | 6 inspectors | 300 |
| Internal failure | 6,000 units reworked at USD 30 | 180 |
| External failure | 2,000 units at USD 250 | 500 |
| Total cost of quality | 980 |
My notes on this case
0 of 5,000 characters. Saves automatically.